this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
360 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19132 readers
3924 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Should Donald Trump fail a second time to be re-elected he faces the very real possibility of jail time and massive financial penalties due to the sheer volume of criminal cases and civil lawsuits that are on hold until after the election.

That is the opinion of Syracuse University law professor Greg Germain who explained in an interview with Newsweek that the former president's only path to get out from under the federal cases he now faces is to beat Vice President Kamala Harris in less than two weeks and then push the Department of Justice to drop the cases filed against him.

As Germain stated, the multiple federal cases Trump is facing are solid and his only path to victory may be having them shut down.

Newsweek source: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-legal-cases-georgia-washington-florida-new-york-stormy-daniels-chutkan-cannon-1974406

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ravhall@discuss.online 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It is a federal crime to threaten the president with harm or death. It's a guarantee a federal agent will look deeper at people who make statements like the one you made.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Is it really a threat to muse about what could happen as some random person on the internet?
It's not like OP announced to do it or called for it to be done.
I'd see it differently if a person with a lot of followers (especially crazy ones) would dare to think something like this aloud. Does this law cover former presidents as well?

Anyway... Remember: it's a losing battle trying to be tolerant of the intolerant!

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Let’s tolerate genocide then too? Wouldn’t want to be intolerant of people who are intolerant.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Let’s tolerate genocide then too?

This is lemmy.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 2 points 4 days ago
[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In normal context, this likely wouldnt amount to a threat however comments like this about high ranking official esp ex Pres will most definitely getting flagged for a review to asses validity of the threat.

This is just how the system works. And these comments attract spooks so people should be mindful.

I am not sure if kill the rich comments get similar attention but i wouldnt be surprised.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online -2 points 4 days ago

Flagged on lemmy, lol. No where else.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No one is looking into me, sooo, you’re wrong.

It is my personal opinion, that his elimination would be better for society. I’m allowed to say whatever I want. And if the “fed” wants to bitch, they can message me and I’ll come down and have a little chat with them. Which will go nowhere, as you know…

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They are not coming over becuase the threat is not credible.

Make no mistake that it is being catalogued tho.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You put way too much faith in the US government

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

When secret service aint banging hookers in brazil, i am pretty sure they do their jobs.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They've had several high profile failures to perform their jobs just this year.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 1 points 4 days ago

Well, I’m still here so I guess they’re fucking hookers in Brazil.

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I am sure some spook now has to check your profile...

[–] ravhall@discuss.online -1 points 4 days ago

You’re sure about so many things that aren’t correct.