this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
295 points (98.4% liked)

News

23397 readers
3621 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Another fired worker, Hossam Nasr, said the purpose of the vigil was both “to honor the victims of the Palestinian genocide in Gaza and to call attention to Microsoft’s complicity in the genocide” because of the use of its technology by the Israeli military.

Nasr said his firing was disclosed on social media by the watchdog group Stop Antisemitism more than an hour before he received the call from Microsoft. The group didn’t immediately respond Friday to a request for comment on how it learned about the firing.

The same group had months earlier publicly called on Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella to take action against Nasr for his public stances on Israel.

Nasr, an Egyptian-raised 2021 graduate of Harvard University, is also a co-organizer of Harvard Alumni for Palestine.

Google earlier this year fired more than 50 workers in the aftermath of protests over technology the company is supplying the Israeli government amid the Gaza war. The firings stemmed from internal turmoil and sit-in protests at Google offices centered on “Project Nimbus,” a $1.2 billion contract signed in 2021 for Google and Amazon to provide the Israeli government with cloud computing and artificial intelligence services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works 77 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

why are the tech giants so happy to astroturf support for progressives on every single hot button issue except this one? Why is the line drawn at Gaza and not BLM or rainbow capitalism

[–] rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because all that shit is fake and cost nearly nothing. Weapons are very real and cost a lot. Progressive policy is only popular as lip service to voters who are desperate to give the ruling class another shot; actually putting your money where your mouth is doesn't get bipartisan support, hence all the centrist, do-nothing legislation you guys are putting out lately.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because this would actually have significant actual costs to the business were these people taken seriously and MSFT divested from military software to Israel, and because they are stating that MSFT is complicit with and facilitating genocide.

BLM? LGBTQ? Those market demographics can be successfully pandered to and placated with some marketing and fairly minor, localized changes to HR policies.

MSFT is not directly, simply, grotesquely obviously making money off of harming blacks or queers in a way that a very simple business decision could immediately remedy.

People who know that your company is currently aiding and abetting a genocide?

Tougher market demographic to appease. They have specific, black and white demands that would hurt the bottom line if addressed as seriously as they want them to be.

So...

... Fire the whistleblowers, disavow their claims, distract with whatever you can, cast them as Anti-Semitic, destroy their reputation however you can.

If you don't... you have to actually answer to their accusations and ... you know, stop making money, ruin a profitable long term partnership.

Corporations are psychopathic and sociopathic. They don't have feelings. They don't have morals.

They have the profit motive. They have goals, situation management meetings, and potential outcomes assessments.

They will always choose what is the least costly, or most profitable solution to a threat, and they'll turn on a dime toward whatever solution is optimal from a profitability and ~~reputation~~ public image standpoint.

(Reputation implies trust built over time. Public Image is more vague, but usually more oriented towards right now)

... They're already axing DEI initiatives and employees, btw. They made the determination already that eh, we think public sentiment has shifted such that ... this is all now more costly than the benefits of good PR.

https://www.ign.com/articles/microsoft-dei-lead-blasts-company-in-internal-email-after-team-is-reportedly-laid-off

They don't give a fuck about giving people from diverse backgrounds a more equal opportunity, as some kind of heartfelt conviction that they truly owe this to society... they never did.