Asklemmy

43684 readers

2161 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

What word or term annonys you? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 22 hours ago by SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

238 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Please don't think I'm here to complain about rizz or skibidi toilet etc. Thats all fine by me.

The term I dislike strongly is 'eeeh' before you make a statement disagreeing with someone. (This is over text only). Now maybe I've been pavloved bc it's always used by someone disagreeing. But I'm happy with people disagreeing with me normally its just the 'eeeh' or 'erm' that annoys me.

So what's a random term that annoys you?

PS. Saying "eeeh actually 'eeh' is a perfectly fine term" would be a ridiculously easy joke and I will judge you for making it. And I know atleast one person will. Especially bow that I've said all this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 27 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

"Ding ding ding!" When someone agrees with something you wrote, but wants to make sure that you know that they already knew and claim ownership of the statement that you wrote. Condesending asshole. I did not arrive at your opinion late.

"Meanwhile" in cooking recipes. Just no. I am following a recipe in stepwise order. You do not get to tell me what I should have already done in the previous step.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 10 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

The entire way recipes are written is trash.

"Add the flour and stir gently": How much flour? Why do I have to scroll back up to check?!

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 4 hours ago

It makes sense to have the ingredients first for making a shopping list and prepping. However, I do agree, with recipes being online, it should be a small task to include the quantity in the description too, even if it is adjustable for different servings.

[–] joe_archer@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Because the amounts can vary based on the number of servings, but the method doesn't.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm doubling the amounts anyway, just give them to me in-line!

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago

As much as I despise the fat-tongued mockney, Jamie Oliver's website is the only one I've seen that has the ingredients and method on two tabs so you can flick between them

Dunno why they're not all like that

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 20 hours ago

Oooh yeah. Even saying, 'this'.