this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
-18 points (27.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2042 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s not obtuse, it’s a fact. Maybe just realized as a fact, but a fact nonetheless.

Show me evidence of this supposed fact of yours then.

I guess it would be Spain for Cuba. Have they asked? Has Cuba asked the US?

An intentional deflection from the point of US sanctions harming Cuba's ability to support itself after a natural disaster. But to entertain your question, yes they did ask.

Personally I’d be all for helping. To a point.

No you just want to tie your views on humanitarian aid to political beliefs, and not actual humanitarian ones. It's abundantly clear you're not able to see America do anything wrong on the world stage and instead insist that everything it's done is justified but fail to actually provide the justifications.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

yes they did ask

They asked for money? That's kind of funny. They know Congress would never give them money.

No, actually I'd be for it, to a point. Had a friend of mine piloting a hurricane hunter during the height of tensions with Cuba. He was in the middle of a storm run and lost an engine. An oh shit moment and declared an emergency. Cuba gave himn permission to land, gave him coffee, fixed the plane, sent him on his way. Cuba watches NOAA and appreciates it.

But, not money. They can buy food and medical supplies from us, so maybe a small line of credit. Congress would be needed for that BTW

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I see nothing funny about a country whose in abject poverty, thanks to foreign interference, be in a dire situation due to a natural disaster.

They know Congress would never give them money.

Kinda the point, no?

They can buy food and medical supplies from us

With what fucking money?

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The expectation is funny, considering Congress hasn't financed disaster recovery in the US yet.

Its not the US taxpayer's problem if Cuba can't afford something. If you've ever visited the Caribbean you would know there are a lot of countries on a tight budget.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The expectation is funny, considering Congress hasn't financed disaster recovery in the US yet.

What? What are you even talking about here?

Its not the US taxpayer's problem if Cuba can't afford something. If you've ever visited the Caribbean you would know there are a lot of countries on a tight budget.

It is, when they apply international pressure to sanction them and forcing the entire country into poverty.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

What? What are you even talking about here?

Congress is not in session, and hasn't passed a bill to pay the damages from two hurricanes.

It is, when they apply international pressure to sanction them and forcing the entire country into poverty.

BS. There is no international pressure.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

And yet, the US just announced foreign aid to Gaza the other day.

BS. There is no international pressure.

Just read the article man. This is just getting sad. I feel like I'm talking to a MAGA voter with the amount of deflection and fanaticism you're displaying. And I haven't even touched on all the misinformation I had to call you out on.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Congress assigned money to be used by State some time ago.

I feel like the MAGA guys may not be wrong about about this woke thing. Though they do have Blame America instead of Blame Erybody Not US, it's still nativisum

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok so foreign aid can still be distributed. Thanks for helping me prove my point.

And yeah, you would think that way.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

When congress passes a foreign aid bill, it doesn't just open the wallet. The destination and conditions are stipulated.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

it doesn’t just open the wallet.

It kind of does.

The Office of Foreign Assistance is responsible for the supervision and overall strategic direction of foreign assistance programs administered by the U.S. Department of State and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

See what I mean about how much misinformation you generate? How about your next reply comes with sources and backed up facts?

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

USAID is different than the humanitarian aid Gaza got. USAID is for specific projects at the department of states discretion. There are rules for what qualifies. For instance Egypt may need telecom cable and dont have the wherewithal, so they put in a USAID request. Theres a limited amount in USAID. I dont have time to teach you more.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I dont have time to teach you more.

No, you just have time to make up random facts and without sources. Again.

For instance Egypt may need telecom cable and dont have the wherewithal, so they put in a USAID request.

Similar to how Cuba asked for aid?

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If you actually knew how government funding works then I would have time.

No, In the case of Cuba they would not qualify for USAID even if they did fill out the paperwork. In addition, even if they did qualify USAID funds are sometimes not available for years.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks for once again not providing me anything substantive. Arguing with you is truly a pathetic waste of time.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

I found it a waste of time. So let's stop.