Technology

59641 readers

2620 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

738

REPORT: Arm is sensationally canceling the license that allowed Qualcomm to make Snapdragon chips which power everything from Microsoft's Copilot+ PCs to Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tablets (www.windowscentral.com)

submitted 1 month ago by buckbanzai@infosec.pub to c/technology@lemmy.world

209 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Adam Smith came up with it. It's also how actual economists use it. Don't confuse that with how business majors, politicians, and generally peddlers of institutionalised market failure use it.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can you point to a few examples of economists using it? Obviously I won't count Lemmy users.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In the hardcore contemporary literature you mostly see more precise language such as perfect competition, (theoretical) situations which are pareto-optimal, which is built on Adam's rational choice models. The maths became more solid, the idea didn't change. They didn't have game theory back then.

And FFS read The Wealth of Nations and see what he thought of monopolists he'd consider our billionaires to be no different than the kings of old. The father of capitalism was out for universal wealth and happiness, not personal enrichment.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You honestly seem obsessed with that adam dude.

I think your problem is that you seem to think that "perfect" mathematical models will ever work in real life.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think your problem is that you seem to think that “perfect” mathematical models will ever work in real life.

I said the exact opposite the whole thread. Are you confusing me with a capitalist or something.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's all you talk about though.

No one cares about Adam when his ideas are frankly stupid. Or at least how you describe them. He might be a solid dude.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

It's all you fucking asked about.