this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
738 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59641 readers
4214 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Toes@ani.social -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I'm just being a little pedantic. But I believe you meant x64?

Edit: x86_64 thanks guys

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

X64 doesn't exist. Microsoft used the label for Windows for a while to distinguish from IA64 (Itanium) and 32bit x86 editions of Windows but these days Microsoft moved mostly away from those labels and only uses them when talking about ARM.

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They did, AMD holds the x64 license, Intel holds the x86.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 1 month ago

The x86 license itself doesn't matter much anymore. Those patents expired a long time ago. Early x86_64 is held by AMD, but those patents are also expiring soon.

There's more advancements past that which are held by both Intel and AMD. You still can't make a modern x86 CPU on your own. Soon, you'll be able to make a CPU with an instruction set compatible with the first Athlon 64-bit processors, but that's as far as it goes.