this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
730 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

58866 readers
4053 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
730
REPORT: Arm is sensationally canceling the license that allowed Qualcomm to make Snapdragon chips which power everything from Microsoft's Copilot+ PCs to Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and tablets (www.windowscentral.com)
submitted 2 days ago by buckbanzai@infosec.pub to c/technology@lemmy.world
208 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Don't just give the extortionists more money

Or maybe they were just trying to pay a lot less money, and then they got caught at their little trick.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Do you know how much money you have to pay to make a RISC V chip? Even less than that, since it's free

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 25 points 2 days ago

Development is never free, especially, if you have to build new knowhow and can not build upon the one they have built at development of ARM chips.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it's that's easy / cheap then why have they not?

This is a big ol' game of bluff from both sides. So, according to you, Qualcomm should call their bluff?

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They would need a new core design

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

Wonder how long that'd take, hmm?

[–] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

By that logic every company would just run on linux. Free to use ≠ free to implement and support.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

You have not read the article.