Games

16838 readers

712 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

[Nerrel] A Word on the Death of Switch Emulation (www.youtube.com)

submitted 1 month ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] halfapage@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago

There's no simple answer to that since games become inaccessible in different ways and with different severities. It'll always be an argument you have to make.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think we all know the "preservation" argument is bullshit. I don't know why we keep pretending. 99% of people copying games are not "preserving" them, they're playing games they didn't pay for.

Whether or not you think it's wrong to do so is another argument. But can we just start being honest with ourselves? You're not opening a museum, and you know it.

[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 12 points 1 month ago

Personal preservation is perfectly valid and doesn't automatically mean sharing aka piracy. If killing emulation prevents a legit owner from playing their game you're diminishing the authority of that ownership. Now I'm not arguing all claims of personal preservation are always ok since some games give you a limited license to play and are not owned, but that just means it's important to see the nuance

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

That is completely irrelevant. Piracy is already illegal. If you pirate software you can be jailed and/or sued.

Emulation development, however, is completely legal and protected by law and precedent.