this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
220 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19062 readers
3779 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soup@lemmy.cafe 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s absolutely not true. It’s your opinion- as a good portion of what you’re saying isn’t something you could possibly ever know. It’s not even causing her to lose this election as this election hasn’t even happened yet.

And whatever polls you’re getting your OPINION from…. Yeah. They don’t know either.

Stop with the misinformation.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Unless the polls are wildly wrong this year, then what I am saying is the objective truth. Kamala is losing this election. The polls could be wrong; but they are probably not. That being unsettling to you doesn't make it false.

And what we do know is that just about the time that Kamala started to shift to the right, this coincides with her loss in momentum and subsequent stalling out, and then backsliding in the polls.

And I've got to keep repeating it because a cult-like mentality of denying reality has gripped many people. Its sad and uncomfortable that she isn't doing better. But we have to live in a fact based world, even if we don't want to hear it.

Reality: Kamala's polling numbers have gone to shit.

Reality: She was doing really well up until the convention. On the final day of the convention, she refused to platform a Gazan and instead platformed several Republicans.

Reality: She then accepted Dick Cheney and Liz Cheney's endorsements, both neoconservatives, and started pitching herself as a "bi-partisian" good for business candidate, going so far as to hit the campaign trail with Liz Cheney.

Reality: These shifts in policy, rhetoric, and how she was campaigning correlate almost exactly with when she stalled out and began to slide in polling.

[–] Soup@lemmy.cafe 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Unless the polls…

Gonna stop ya there champ. This is where you made a mistake.

Pols aren’t facts.

Didn’t bother reading the rest. You’re stating an opinion based on polling. You have no idea what you’re talking about here.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Pols aren’t facts.

I mean for you, it seems like facts aren't facts. You are literally refusing to participate in a shared reality.

[–] Soup@lemmy.cafe 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I don’t participate in bullshit predictions by people who have zero credentials to accurately make predictions.

Fee free to continue stating opinions as fact, and I’ll continue to call you out for it as I’ve done here.

I’m not entering a back and forth with you on this.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago

I don’t participate in bullshit predictions by people who have zero credentials to accurately make predictions.

Yeah I got it from previous comment. No need to repeat yourself. You live in a world of personal fantasy disconnected from any kind of objective reality where we would have to just "agree" on some verifiable facts, like the results of a poll.