this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
1669 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
2862 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
1669
The average car purchased in 2023 emits higher levels of carbon dioxide (CO₂) than its 2013 equivalent. This is due to the large proportion of SUVs in the mix, which tend to be bigger and heavier. (english.elpais.com)
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
352 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BarterClub@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And we did this to ourselves to make pickups in the USA not be required to have additional licensing. We did before Ragan if I recall correctly.

Edit

4 replies and they are fixated on Ragan. Didn’t state he was repossable or not. Here is a good video about this. https://youtu.be/jN7mSXMruEo?si=7PsOF-WE8MXX87vX

[–] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What the fuck does Regan have anything to do with a comparison from 2013 -> 2023?

What is this fixation with Regan I see on Lemmy literally everywhere?

The correct answer is to charge taxes based on miles driven * [a factor/multiplier of the]cars weight.

Not sure what a president from 1988 would have shit to do with this.

Edit: Also, this article is UK based... So it's even doubly so of "what the fuck does Regan have to do with it?"

[–] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I agree it’s as silly as it is unproductive to claim that Reagan is directly responsible for something like this, as if everything he did was somehow written in stone for 30+ years.

The person you replied to was referencing the CAFE standards, which are far more lenient when it comes to so-called “light trucks”. Thanks to a vague legal definition that was never changed , “the class includes vans, minivans, sport utility vehicles, and pickups” (source). Since inefficient “light trucks” are much more profitable than fuel-efficient cars, that’s where the marketing budget went for the last couple decades.

A couple of important hiccups, though:

  1. The CAFE standards were enacted in 1975. Yes, Reagan pushed back during his presidency in the 80s, but how does that make him directly responsible for the state of automobiles in 2023 again?
  2. The study cited by this article was conducted in fucking England lol
[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People see a meme saying Reagan is the root of all evil and think it's actually true.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

The actual root of all evil is fucking Woodrow Wilson!