this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
1012 points (97.6% liked)
Technology
59666 readers
2889 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You mean all they didn't do? But the answer is in your question. Better integration with the OS. That's the problem. IE6 did the same thing. Then MS started altering standards a bit once they gained majority of users. This resulted in broken standards and monopoly that took us decades to break. Remember that Microsoft is the creator of EEE...
Yes but now the same situation that happened with the old IE is happening with Chrome, so I guess a little bit of competition wouldn't be a bad thing
It's still the same engine, so in a way they are not competing. FF is the only alternative in town and that scares me. Even Opera gave up on their engine. And indeed Google is trying to do a similar thing, but they have less power to do so than what Microsoft did. Google can force certain things, but Microsoft is in far better position to push things their way. But like you said, competition is a good thing.