this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
12 points (87.5% liked)

Voyager

5657 readers
34 users here now

The official lemmy community for Voyager, an open source, mobile-first client for lemmy.

Download on App Store

Download on Play Store

Use as a Web App

Download on F-Droid

Rules

  1. Be nice.
  2. lemmy.world instance policy

Sponsor development! 👇

Number of sponsors badge

💙

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If I go to ban a user, it shows successful in the app, but no mod logs will show the user banned, and they’re able to continue to post- after a ban via Voyager app

I have to go outside of voyager to do any ban moderation. Has this always been a thing?

EDIT: it seems it works fine for permanent bans. But not for temporary bans.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

huh that IS odd🤔


Without knowing how the underlying app's systems work:

My guess is that the app might be acknowledging the ban request as a confirmation that the request was sent (button pressed? yes: Display "Ban Confirmed") but wasn't verified/validated that the request was indeed successfully accepted on the instance's side

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I suppose that is possible. Though I’ll admit I’m not techy enough to fully understand that.

[–] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

hmm another way of looking at this is that:

You've inserted coins into the vending machine (entered ban descriptions and other inputs) but after pressing the juice button, the vending machine doesn't dispense your drink but it displays "Drink dispensing in progress" (the drink buttons and display works but there's a gap/shortcircuit between the display and the dispensing arm (the dispensing arm being the instance for this situation)

So the problem might be on:

  • the app's side
  • the instance

or it could even be a mix of both (¿Por qué no los dos?), hard to know till someone tests all possibilities

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

See… now you’re speaking my lingo. I get it.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seems to work fine for permanent bans. But not temporary ones.

[–] recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

ah in that case I'd recommend linking to this post as a comment onto the second Github Issue link I shared above as it seems to be a replication of sallyFoster's reported bug👍