politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
How bad is your registration system if you allowed 6500 noncitizens onto your voter roles? I’m not sure you should be boasting
even funnier from the article:
"His office then edited the press release after publication, softening it by adding the word “potential” before noncitizens."
Which means he knows he removed citizens. Which is illegal. I'm assuming he's lawyering up now.
His lawyer is AG Paxton, who is somehow a worse person than Abbott
I mean, you COULD make that assumption. It also just sounds like “we just removed people. citizens? Illegals? Who knows?” Incompetence
Right? What fucking kind of win is this?
Hey everyone look I claimed to fix a problem that either didn't exist or was vastly overstated and to the extent it did exist it was due to my own incompetence!!
See no one cares.
Unfortunately, the base he's speaking to, is rabidly cheering him on and congratulating him.
People tend to forget, these announcements are meant for us. They are meant for their cultists and they work.
In many areas, non-citizens are allowed to vote in local elections. They may not be eligible to vote in federal elections, but some states allow all residents. not just citizens, to vote in local and/or state elections. So non-citizens being on the voter rolls is normal and expected, they just have to be tracked separately from the citizens that can vote in every election.
I don't know about Texas specifically), but removing non-citizens from voter rolls in those areas simply because they're non-citizens could actually be illegal. Although, that would of course be a state law, and thus us to the State's AG to prosecute, not likely in these hypocritical states.
There's also the entirely likely possibility that these "noncitizens" are actually citizens entered into the voter rolls incorrectly by the State at some point in the past, meaning whatever proof they used at the time, wasn't recorded. There is something going through the courts in AZ currently related to a group of registered voters from like 20+ years ago that either pre-dated that information being recorded, or the information is now missing for whatever reason. And of course the Republicans want them removed as close to the election as possible so there isn't enough time to verify citizenship before the election, instead of going through that at any point in the last 2 years when there was plenty of time to properly verify and correct the missing info.