self-explenatory ๐ฆ
this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
1362 points (98.2% liked)
Asklemmy
43939 readers
472 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Failed. It asked for one duck.
that's just duck dna dont judge
What if this is a quantum duck that is simultaneously both two ducks, but also just one duck?
Then it proves none of us can observe, or it would have collapsed!
Also I feel The Quantum Duck should be a James Bond-esque spy, but a duck.
Damnit, physics wins again!
Okay, you now know what your next drawing target should be - get quacking!