this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
901 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59641 readers
3561 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnthropomorphicCat@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago (3 children)

All that extra processing power for the AI to just say: "you should have listened to the scientists years ago".

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

100% this. We fucking know what the solution is. AI will reach the same conclusion as we have; decarbonise everything. It’s the implementation that’s hard, not the idea.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Unless AI wants to keep itself alive...

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 1 month ago

Oh to hear the AI give us the “well I guess you should have thought of THAT before you did something WRONG” line that some humans use to dehumanize others.

[–] ratel@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

I imagine the likely conclusion of it would come up with would be something like "decrease the size of the human population".