this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
354 points (99.7% liked)

Games

16948 readers
329 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
354
Sony Delists Original Horizon Zero Dawn on PC, Forces PSN Requirement for Remaster (www.ign.com)
submitted 2 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
91 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Balthazar@sopuli.xyz 50 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Wait a minute.

WHY TF IS HORIZON ZERO DAWN GETTING AN REMASTER!?!?!

WHAT IS THE POINT? What stupid idiot thought this was a good idea????

And that bloody price tag! €50 for accessibility features and slightly better performance? Why... Why is this a successful way to make money? ... I... I'm sad now.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because if they remaster it, they can also remaster the price.
Which is probably why they've pulled all the old versions.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think they are actually asking, "if this is such an obviously stupid move, and there aren't enough stupid people to buy the game, why would Sony even bother working on this?".

Either the costs were incredibly low, or they figure they will profit off the data they collect enough to make up for it, in my opinion.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think there are enough stupid people.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Possible, surely. Gamers are pretty well informed these days though. And the original game looks beautiful already.

The people who would care about the graphical difference would know enough to know how stupid this is right?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think so, a lot of people just want "the best" and don't need to actually have quantifiable reasons why it's "the best." Spending $50 or whatever to get "the best" isn't really a concern when you're mostly looking to max out your $10k gaming PC.

Whether there are enough of those to cover the development costs here is another question, but since they eliminated the alternative, even those who are "smart enough" don't have a realistic alternative.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I guess for those that hadnt already bought the game yet, since the addon is only 10$. I don't know, id be interested to see if they go positive or negative on this game specifically.

[–] tty5@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd pay $10 to forget facial animations of the original one.

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've got a bat. It may take a few tries, and you might forget some other things, but you get what you pay for.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Another option is alcohol. Repeat doses until you get the desired effect.