politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
He absolutely should. I'm in nc (not far enough west to be affected by the storm though) and folks who are hurting really need the help. Plus it'd make cogress look stupid that the president had to hold their hand and say "okay now, let's go do our jobs to help the constituents facing natural disaster. I know you don't want to but part of growing up is having responsibilities"
This is the correct answer, although you know somehow Rs will twist into "fascism" and "authoritarianism".
They've already gone all in on some bullshit like FEMA spent all their money on immigrants that's why they're running out.
I saw this posted on Facebook by a relative. I spent two hours researching and crafting a response that I sent privately. No response. The next day they're posting more bullshit
For what it's worth, this was the message. Maybe it could have been better, but I sent to hours into the void in a vain attempt to get through.
Newsmax and propaganda like it are poison that don't reflect reality. Most "mainstream" news can be biased in what they report, but they generally are truthful when stating facts. Newsmax in particular is propaganda intended to enable grifters and foreign interests by convincing us of bullshit. It can absolutely be convincing bullshit if they can do the cult thing of cutting off friends, family, and any unapproved news source. They all reinforce each other and any story sounds good if you only hear one side. Here's the other side; it's up to you to decide which one makes more sense.
As Helene was coming, Congress voted against additional Funding for FEMA. The President (or Vice President) doens't get a say there.
Money isn't being diverted to immigrants. "FEMA’s disaster response efforts and individual assistance is funded through the Disaster Relief Fund, which is a dedicated fund for disaster efforts. Disaster Relief Fund money has not been diverted to other, non-disaster related efforts."
That money can only be legally "diverted" without an act of Congress to "hurricane, tornado, storm, high water, winddriven water, tidal wave, tsunami, earthquake, volcanic eruption, landslide, mudslide, snowstorm, or drought), or, regardless of cause, any fire, flood, or explosion". It's not being diverted to immigrants.
Is $750 supposed to be too much money given away or not enough? What number should that be? And you can get more if you qualify. It's only the $750 that is instant while they check to see where the money will be spent. Their point is just to make you angry, not to find actualy solutions. You can legitmately argue against any dollar amount. Do you think there's a dollar amount (even $0) where Newsmax wouldn't be angry?
We're having more and worse hurricanes because of climate change and CO2 emissions that we're not doing much to stop.
Republicans are the ones who voted against extending funding for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), including both Alabama senators.
I left it for similar reasons. Some people are beyond help.