this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

196

16359 readers
2318 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
moss@lemmy.world
queue@beehaw.org
funky_rodent@lemmy.blahaj.zone
PeachyMcPeachface@lemmy.blahaj.zone
threegnomes@lemmy.blahaj.zone
greembow@lemmy.world
remotelove@lemmy.ca
Roflmasterbigpimp@feddit.de
qaz@lemmy.world
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemm.ee
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@lemmy.ca
A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Qaz@lemmy.ml
qaz@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.sdf.org
5
Just kind of makes sense no? (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by yokonzo@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The only reason I would be against this is because it disincentivizes removing large parking lots, which are primarily a waste of space. If we could replace some of that wasted space with housing (which could also have solar slapped on it) that would be ideal.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Parking lots ain't going anywhere.

[–] Fitzsimmons@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

They are and they must. There is no path forward that doesn't massively disinvest from personal vehicles.