this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
1255 points (94.0% liked)

memes

10435 readers
2516 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I want to seize the means of production as much as the next guy but it gets kinda boring after a while if that's the only content available

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 16 points 1 month ago

Sometimes there are cats! That's always fun! Some of those cats want socialism too, but they're still cats!

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It doesnt get boring hearing about how judges demolish bodily autonomy of women and commit other atrocities in the name of corporate freedom.

[–] dafo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah you mean in the US? I see, well there's also the rest of the world

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Are you positive? I feel like I need a source on that

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If this was memes@lemmy.ml you would've been banned for this comment

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When you assume anyone complaining about .ml and Hexbear must be a liberal

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's a massive overlap between being anti-Marx and being liberal. Doesn't mean all anti-Marxists are liberals, but most are.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I consider myself conservative.

I'll let myself out before this comment thread explodes

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Conservatives fall under the umbrella of liberalism, generally.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 month ago

Sometimes (just don't tell them that)

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's statistically likely, as is their inability to find the block button.

[–] FJW@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No it’s more likely that they are an actual leftist. China and Ruzzia are (and the SU was!) fascist hellholes that have nothing to do with socialism and/or communism besides screaming it of the windows all the time.

And people who delude themselves to believe something else are really annoying…

[–] will_steal_your_username@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree in spirit! However the soviet union was neither capitalist nor communist, and fascism is a form of capitalism which means the soviet union wasn't fascist, but rather something else entirely.

[–] FJW@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m willing to agree partially: AFAIK the usual classification of the economic system of the SU is “state capitalism” which is indeed distinct from capitalism and socialism and I’m even willing to grant it that, if well executed (in the SU it mostly wasn’t) it has the potential to be better than capitalism in a few aspects.

That said, I agree about the notion that fascism is a form of capitalism: The two are often associated with each other, but at the end of the day quite distinct and orthogoanl systems. Fascism is about having a powerful leader who oppresses the population and the SU very much had that in an almost textbook-manner with Stalin, though I will also acknowledge that there were of course detals in hwo it differed from say Naziism in Germany at the same time.

Fascism is by definition a form of capitalism :P As defined by Mussolini back then and by political scientists today. It's not just about dictatorship, but about the relationship between private businesses and the state.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Fun fact: blocking a community doesn't stop you from mentioning them in a joking manner elsewhere!

[–] will_steal_your_username@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tankies are authoritarians and therefore cannot call themselves socialist

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

For clarity, comtemporaries of Marx and Engels also called them authoritarian, hence On Authority.