this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
372 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

60083 readers
3260 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] einkorn@feddit.org 92 points 2 months ago (2 children)

For me, it is a glorified auto-complete function. Could definitely live without it.

[–] CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world 52 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Same for me, but that glorified auto complete helps a lot.

[–] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hell yea. Our unit test coverage went way up because you can blow through test creation in second. I had a large complicated migration from one data set to another with specific mutations based on weird rules and GPT got me 80% of the way there and with a little nudging basically got it perfect. Code that would've taken a few hours took about 6 prompts. If I'm curious about a new library I can get a working example right away to see how everything fits together. When these articles say there's no benefit I feel people aren't using these tools or don't know how to use them effectively.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's useful, you just gotta keep it on a short leash, which is difficult when you don't know what you're doing

Basically, it's a useful tool for experienced developers that know what to look out for

From the combined comments it looks like if you are a beginner or a pro then it's great; if you only have just enough knowledge to be dangerous (in german that's proverbial "gefährliches Halbwissen") you should probably stay away from it :-)

[–] Kualk@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We always have to ask what language is it auto-completing for? If it is a strictly typed language, then existing tooling is already doing everything possible and I see no need for additional improvement. If it is non-strictly typed language, then I can see how it can get a little more helpful, but without knowledge of actual context I am not sure if it can get a lot more accurate.