this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
533 points (98.4% liked)

News

23153 readers
3126 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As a medical user, I really hope she will stick to this if elected. Trump is doing more "leave it up to the states" bullshit except specifically for Florida and no other state.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

TBF, "Leave it up to the states" in the context of recreational use is appropriate here. Extending that concept would necessarily include having extremely limited federal regulation, if any at all.

Medical use, in my opinion, should be federally protected, such that you can acquire medical use cannabis for a uniform set of medical purposes in all states.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (4 children)

100% disagree. First because it puts people in prison for spurious reasons and secondly because it's a plant. You can literally just grow it in your back yard. And it will grow really easily. It doesn't even take work.

You know what will totally fuck you up but is totally legal to own and grow and use? Salvia divinorum. You know what else? San Pedro cactus.

Even with shrooms, it's legal to own the spores when you're talking about psilocybin and Amanita Muscaria is 100% legal. It can literally kill you.

We don't even need to go into tobacco.

How does any of that make sense?

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know what will totally fuck you up but is totally legal to own and grow and use? Salvia divinorum.

Salvia is fucking wild. I do not recommend it unless you want to lose your mind for ~10 minutes or so. Like, from sober to "holy shit I'm on the wheel of fortune right now" in an instant.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I only did it once. Apart from tasting absolutely horrible, the trip wasn't even fun. I was laying on the ground and suddenly I was standing upright and was a cowboy leaning against the porch post of a ranch house. And then I was me again. What was the point?

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To become a cowboy, very momentarily, pardner

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But I didn't want to be a cowboy. :(

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Space cowboy? Spaced out cowboy?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well... Some people call me the Space Cowboy...

Then again, some call me the gangster of love.

Some people call me Maurice and that's weird because it's just not my name.

[–] Aphelion@lemm.ee -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

While I complete and totally agree that it should be legalized, or at least federally rescheduled and completely decriminalized, I worry about what happens when it's federally regulated and taxed.

If it is federally legalized and taxed, it will likely become the domain of the ATF, who will ~~take over~~ continue kicking in doors and doing raids on anyone who is not a huge corporate grower. Marlboro has already trademarked Marlboro Greens and I'm sure every other tobacco giant has their branding ready.

Leaving regulation and taxation to each state is probably better long term, otherwise it's just going to be a corporate cash grab with established local growers and suppliers getting screwed.

Regardless, it should be completely legal to grow it in your back yard.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh I didn't say it made sense, especially in comparison to other legally produced intoxicants. If things made sense, we wouldn't have gestures widely.

But in the nonsensical paradigm, relegating the legal status of a recreational drug to the state level would be appropriate, and most certainly a step in the right direction. More to the point, I don't see it being possible for the federal government to command nationwide legality of recreational cannabis. This is why I made a separate statement about medical use.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The federal government doesn't need to command that though. They can say that it is federally legal but still allow individual states or smaller governmental divisions to make it illegal. That's not how it should be, but that is how it works with alcohol, which is why there are dry counties and why Utah can regulate the amount of alcohol in its beer and wine.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

That's kind of what I was saying. Recreational cannabis would be appropriately handled just like that, while preserving the right of all Americans to receive certain kinds of medical care (Roe) should be federally guaranteed, regardless of what state you live in.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All these drugs you cite as negative examples have a really good safety profile. So no idea why you do that.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
  1. I didn't cite them as negative examples.
  2. Amanita muscaria can, as I said, kill you.
  3. Let's see tobacco's good safety profile.
[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

I agree on tobacco, maybe some DIY type of vaping is OK.

The rest is fine and if you consume any of these plants like fly agaric then you just have to know what you are doing.

Compared to alcohol anamita muscaria may have a better profile.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

I mean I would appreciate it if it were federally legal. I live in a state where its legal but I'm employed by the federal government so I can't use it without putting my job at risk.