Your approach is not pragmatic, it is just what you have been told to do by your masters. It does nothing but entrench the genocuders and ensure that they will never have to think about you electorally. It's a self-defeat.

I speak in terms of building leverage and organizations.

Though really, the issue here seems to be that you refuse to engage with what I say.

[+] curiousaur@reddthat.com -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh I'm engaging.

No, you are ignoring 90% of what I say so that I have to repeat myself because you say things I've already contradicted. I assume this is a defensive reaction to having your genocide support called out.

You are fucking stupid. You are wrong. You are arguing in bad faith

If I was any of those things you could run circles around me and tackle my arguments. Instead you are avoiding and ignoring nearly everything I say. In contrast, I have addressed basically everything you have said, despite those behaviors.

You are now defensively lashing out rather than address what I said.

I fully expect that you're a foreign actor or influenced by them. How's that for engaging.

It's the opposite if engaging, it is playing with imaginary BS to continue lashing out rather than address what was said.

Your support for genociders is not strategic and you do not sound like someone that is actually doing anything else. You sound like someone that really wants to vote for those genociders and then stop thinking about it.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 2 months ago

Say it then. Do you want Kamala or Trump to be president?