this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
169 points (90.0% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
2825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kolorafa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you create a good product the market will pick it up, throwing cash at random projects and killing it when it doesn't make huge profit sounds wasteful.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Committing resources to projects then keeping them/killing them depending on how they go really isn't abnormal or a poor business practice, no matter how much you try to make it sound like one.

[–] kolorafa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

True, if you have extra money, ...

It just 'feel' bad/wrong like now Google has a brand that they will quickly kill any project they start.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

No, if you have any amount of money. Large or small.

Havingess money, if anything, presses you to kill projects more.