this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
283 points (96.4% liked)

World News

39371 readers
2332 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Swiss People’s Party (SVP), which centered its campaign on anti-immigrant rhetoric, is projected to win 29 percent of the vote, up from 25.6 percent four years ago and higher than pre-election polls. It has been the country’s largest party since 2003.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this is going to be an unpopular take but you've said a bunch of vaguely-sounding popular things but have missed the main issues with immigration.

Anyone who says they want to limit immigration for cultural reasons (e.g. I may wear a hat you don't like, or speak a different language, or comb my hair in a different way) is lying.

"but so-and-so said..."

they were lying.

It boils down to this: if you can meet a (surprisingly low) wage in your new host country, you are a net benefit to that country and will be welcomed.

All that about burqas, treatment of women, LGBTQ+ rights is irrelevant. All that stuff about assimilating, or values, or tough restrictions is nonsense. Politicians say that stuff all the time. But it's a lie. The truth is in the policy and the policy says: if you earn roughly USD$20k or local equivalent a year: welcome home!

Now people may think it should be different - but that I'd not the reality.

[–] ZK686@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, what are you suggesting? I mean, you sound like you're just going with the same old "let everyone in, worry about it later..." rhetoric that many on the Left like to spew...

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I'm saying that the real immigration question is "how much money do you want to lose?"

immigrants are incredibly valuable, long term, to a country. You get someone who - even if they end up earning minimum wage - didn't cost you anything to birth, nurse, and raise, doesnt qualify for benefits but starts paying tax. Even just the savings on the cost of school itself probably makes an immigrant worth it monetarily.

Not only that but the marginal cost it does take, that would eat into those "profits", is then paid for by the fees an immigrant pays to emigrate.

That's why the only check is a fairly low income checkmark, so that the process remains profitable.