this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
47 points (96.1% liked)

Selfhosted

39640 readers
309 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So the final thing tethering me to macOS is Apple Photos, which is really a fantastic program.

PhotoPrism looks like it’s improving quickly, but I was curious to know how it’s going today with regards to:

  • Search filters
    • Date
    • Place
    • Object/person recognition
    • Text recognition
  • Live Photo support
  • Ease of importing
  • Album support, including smart albums
  • Built-in touch ups
  • General stability
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 48 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I would suggest you have a look of immich.

  • Search filters ✓
  • Date ✓
  • Place ✓
  • Object/person recognition ✓
  • Text recognition ✗
  • Live Photo support ✓
  • Ease of importing ✓
  • Album support ✓, including smart albums ✗
  • Built-in touch ups ✗
  • General stability ✓

It also has mobile apps to do the backup and as a frond end on the phone. And what I really like is you can mount in your existing external libraries without copying all the pictures in and they will just be integrated automatically.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Usual precautions apply, the app does not bury the lede:

The project is under very active development. Expect bugs and changes. Do not use it as the only way to store your photos and videos!

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes, I tried Immich but it's basically a second job, no thanks. Photoprism is very good, but would need something like Syncthing to auto upload. So I ended up going with Libre Photo. It's nowhere near as powerful as Immich in terms of features, but for my over 500K photos and almost 50K videos, works like a charm in ProxMox with the "UhuruPhotos" Android app.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Interesting. For me it was a set and forget. I check the change notes before updating every month or so, make a very small change to the yaml compose, and I am back in action in under 10 minutes.

Different experiences I guess.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Are you hosting in ProxMox too?

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, mine is just a docker container. Maybe there is something with that? Is your containerized in the VM?

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

I usually create 1 LXC and install docker to it to use it as a template for any other LXC in the future. So, docker on a Debian LXC is how I did it. ProxMox in on bare metal though.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Photoprism's app space is pretty bad, but there is an completely hacky yet reliable solution for Android:

  1. PhotoBackup
  2. The PhotoBackup server on your Photoprism server
  3. A cron job that runs the photoprism import command every few minutes.

Since I've had this set up, it's worked as well as Google Photos ever did for keeping my phone snaps synced to the server. It's been more reliable than SyncThing for my data, reacting and syncing faster, and it doesn't mysteriously periodically just stop running like SyncThing.

I don't know if PhotoBackup is available for iOS, but if it is, it works a treat.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Sweet. Never heard of this before. Thanks. I'll take it for a spin over the weekend.

[–] PoopMonster@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Good news is that it's slated to go stable some time this year iirc.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

In keeping an eye on it. I use a rinky dink asustor solution for my photo storage and backups. It's cludgy as all heck.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I love that they clearly say that. IMO they should keep that notice around even later on.

Far too many people spin up some solution for photos or files, either selfhosted or some paid service, and use it as their only storage. Then they're surprised when data loss happens.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah I'm no data retention expert but that is a huge risk.

[–] eternacht@programming.dev 9 points 3 weeks ago

+1 for Immich, I tried photoprism and had a lot of trouble importing and organizing an existing library. Immich works much more intuitively and had all the features I needed.

[–] Railison@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks for the suggestion I’ll follow it up!

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

Immich has been great, I've been running it for something like 1.5 years now I think.

[–] d_ohlin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This is a pretty accurate summary from my experience. The only thing I'd add is that (from what I've read at least) some form of 'smart' album functionality is high on the priority list and shouldn't be too much further down the line. It may be a more advanced customizable logic type of solution (again from what I've read) but the functionality of putting person(s) 'x' into album(s) 'y' (or similar) should be achievable.