Asklemmy

43939 readers

567 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

152

How about we play, "Never have I ever"? (fedia.io)

submitted 1 month ago by bizarroland@fedia.io to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

285 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Here's the rules:

1: Post something you have never done that you think many people do. 2: Read the other posts, if you have done that thing, upvote it. If you have not done that thing, downvote it. 3: If you believe the person is lying, call them out on it in a reply. 4: If you are called out, give the full story. 4a: If you see a thread containing the full story, boost the person you think is right and truthful.

Person who has the most upvotes when the thread dies wins.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

meta: I think you should invert the rules, so that if you have done it, you downvote. The winner with the most votes is then the rarest of them all

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago

If you have done it you upvote. If you have not done it you downvote.

The point is to be the person with the most upvotes because you've not done a thing that most people have done.

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

That's what OP is saying. The wording could be clearer.

Essentially, if you can relate to what the comment says, then downvote.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think you and I share the same mind, but different eyes.

If someone says "I never shot a hippo", then right now I will down vote (because I haven't shot a hippo), so then if it gets upvoted.....

OHhhhhh. It just clicked for me. Yep, you're right. It makes sense

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can someone explain this to me?

if you have done that thing, upvote it. If you have not done that thing, downvote it.

So if someone says "never have I ever eaten food", then I, a food eater, upvote it, right?

[–] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is how I understood it.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

You are correct

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

~~Either my reading comprehension has been turned to dust or you didnt read it~~

2: Read the other posts, if you have done that thing, upvote it.

~~As in: Upvote, I have not done that thing~~

Edit: Seems like I can't read. I think it's called double negation?

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 6 points 1 month ago

The problem is that the "thing" is either:

never have I ever done this or