this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
61 points (93.0% liked)

Technology

59555 readers
3438 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] franklin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Good points. I guess what I should have more accurately said is that Intel has a long standing working relationship with the American government.

Given that Intel is an asset to national security. I think any sort of buyout would be under intense scrutiny.

I did miss that Qualcomm was also American though, but I still think about it would be treacherous regardless.

[โ€“] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Then Qualcomm would become a national security asset. ๐Ÿ˜‚ In fact that alone sounds like a great reason for acquisition. It's not every day that you get a obvious way to become too big/important to fail.

[โ€“] franklin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Things don't just become a national security asset that easily, though, a long-standing relationship with trust is something incredibly important.