You mean the vote that was boycotted by 6 of the 15 soviet occupied countries due to how it was phrased among other things? There was no independence option in the referendum, just how should the USSR be preserved.

The graphic shows that. It's true that at the time, the vast majority of people voted to retain it, and the vast majority of people wish it never dissolved, which is why I included both metrics.

Also most of the Easter European countries voted to declare independence shortly after.

Crucially, Gorbachev and Yeltsin had been liberalizing and destroying the USSR from within, like the creation of a secondary Presidential position that stood against the centralized system and overly beauracratized it. The coup of 1991 further lost people's faith in the government and they seceded, but they did not get to vote on being Socialist or not in the aftermath.

Then came Shock Therapy and roughly 7 million deaths due to the adoption of Capitalism against the will of the people.

I was around 20 at the time and in one of the boycotting countries. We later had a vote for independence, I think the support was around 80% or 90%.

Based on what you've told me about yourself, you may want to look at the figure again, but I won't dox you.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yea, the first link was just how people felt like a while ago when a lot of ex soviet countries were still struggling over a decade ago. That would make sense too, if an economic union collapses your country is fucked for a while. Like if the EU collapsed it would have even more severe consequences and any poll would give similar results for decades to come.

I don't know why they would vote for socialism suddenly during the votes for independence. If Russia couldn't do that with 60 years of killing, imprisoning, slaving and deporting political dissidents, artists, scientists, gays, jews and people not ethnically russian than a referendum for independence ain't gonna make socialism happen either. I guess giving people the ability to vote was rather new but yea, it didn't make socialism happen either.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yea, the first link was just how people felt like a while ago when a lot of ex soviet countries were still struggling over a decade ago.

Communism and Socialism are still more preferred than Capitalism for the majority of ex-soviets.

That would make sense too, if an economic union collapses your country is fucked for a while. Like if the EU collapsed it would have even more severe consequences and any poll would give similar results for decades to come.

Depends, if the EU shifts to Socialism it will probably repeat polling in AES states with mass popular support, what you're describing would probably happen if it collapsed into fascism or barbarism.

I don't know why they would vote for socialism suddenly during the votes for independence.

During the independence votes, the only indicator was that the State would become independent, not that it would become Capitalist. Where are you getting the idea that Socialism was unpopular?

If Russia couldn't do that with 60 years of killing, imprisoning, slaving and deporting political dissidents, artists, scientists, gays, jews and people not ethnically russian than a referendum for independence ain't gonna make socialism happen either.

Killing and imprisoning fascists was a good thing. I don't know what you mean by "make Socialism happen," it was already Socialist. They wanted to keep Socialism. Additionally, Double Genocide Theory is Nazi apologia and ahistorical. Same with the idea that the USSR was "enslaving people."

An Anarchist carrying water for the Nazis, color me surprised.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

An ML not knowing what double genocide theory is is equally unsurprising. It's the claim that the USSR committed atrocities to a similar scale as the nazies. I never even mentioned the nazies.

Many gulags were forced labor camps, also known as slavery.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You claimed the USSR was murdering jews and non-Russians en-masse, not hard to see that you were calling to Double Genocide Theory from that. If you want to correct your statements you can.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The USSR committed horrible atrocities but they weren't as bad as the nazies, obviously. No idea why I have to clarify this, I never even mentioned the nazies.

I have no idea why ML always jump to double genocide when anyone mentiones bad things the soviets did.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The idea of a "Jewish Genocide" by the Soviets is Double Genocide Theory. That's why I said you're free to correct your statements. Yes, the Soviets did some bad things, but you're carrying water for fascists by defending them as "political prisoners" and claiming a Jewish genocide.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Claiming the USSR only sent fascists to gulags is ridiculous. Like a good example is my grandmother and her 6 kids, my mom included. The oldest kid was 10, a bit young for fascist. My grandmother and mom were the only survivors. My granduncle escaped that fate by hiding in the mines of kiviõli. Their crime was being jewish.

Also gay communities were regularly dubbed fascist for being gay here. Several Estonian writers and artists were sent to gulags as well. Jaan Kross for example was arrested by both the nazies and soviets and held in the same secret police building both used. Though he was later sent to a gulag where he was for 10 years.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I didn't claim only fascists were sent to gulags, the vast majority of political prisoners were fascists.