this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
1379 points (96.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21378 readers
1295 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Allero@lemmy.today 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    Ooookay, this will get controversial.

    Proud Manjaro/Debian user!

    • Ubuntu and derivatives suck because of Canonical and their practices
    • Fedora sucks because of Red Hat
    • OpenSUSE sucks because RPM (why?!) and still SUSE (but they're the best of the three)
    • Rest is exotic and obscure

    So we end up with Arch and Debian. Debian 12 is good enough as is, and runs on a work laptop where I don't care about anything but stability. Arch is respectable and great, but requires excessive maintenance to work properly. Among its derivatives, Endeavour is just a nicer archinstall (so, why?), Garuda is cool but unstable and too gamer'y, Manjaro is a bit problematic at times but generally the safest bet when it comes to Arch. So, when it comes to my main PC doubling as a gaming rig, this is a no-brainer.

    [–] Agent641@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    this will get controversial

    In a linux community? Im shocked, shocked!

    [–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Normally when people hear Manjaro, hell breaks loose :D

    Apparently folks here are a lot more chill about it

    [–] LeFantome@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    What did you not like about EndeavourOS?

    [–] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

    The fact that it adds too little to Arch to be seen as a separate entity. And I don't want to run mainline Arch. It requires too much maintenance to work with it properly, and every update is a bit of a gamble on what's gonna break next - unless you spend solid time reading notes to every update.

    [–] Moshpirit@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    I have been using both distros in the last 5 years and Manjaro was way more problematic to me than Arch, TBH. The Linux Experiment created a video with some of the big issues of Manjaro BTW. That said, this is no war, everyone can enjoy their favourite distro. Whatever works best for each of us.

    [–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Yeah, I am aware of some of those controversies, and they sure are unfortunate!

    However, it's really, really hard to find a well-supported distro free of controversies. Still doesn't excuse Manjaro on that front.

    I personally did not test Arch for such a long time, but what I had I certainly didn't like. Also, full barebones approach is not for me, and more of an enthusiast kind of thing. So, to each their own indeed!

    [–] Konstant@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    I didn't like that it doesn't have a graphical software manager like Manjaro

    [–] LeFantome@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    Fair enough. Of course, you know that the exact same graphical installer is also available on EOS right? It is not installed by default but it is in the repos.

    [–] PoolloverNathan@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
    [–] Allero@lemmy.today 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

    Lol

    See Ubuntu and derivatives

    [–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
    [–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Lol, fair, fair! :D

    But really, I just see no point for myself when there's Debian 12 already. I've always seen LMDE as a backup of sorts, so that the community would remain should Ubuntu really screw it for everyone. Or if you're Cinnamon maximalist, they have everything as polished as possible for that (but generally you can easily have Cinnamon on mainline Debian)

    I myself am KDE fanboy, though :)