this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
442 points (87.2% liked)

linuxmemes

20986 readers
1622 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Yeah, why does Ubuntu keep snap?

    Like, WTF is the deal with not having any official way to install Firefox other than snap? Firefox.

    [–] ccdfa@lemm.ee 28 points 1 month ago

    Because canonical, who make ubuntu, also make snap. So it gets shoved down your throat. This is why I don't use Ubuntu.

    [–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Fyi, Mozilla released an official apt package a couple months ago to get Firefox without snap

    [–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I do know about that. (You're referring to the PPA repo thing, yeah?) But there are a couple of reasons why that isn't a workable solution specifically for me specifically.

    • The major reason is that I only use Ubuntu on my work machine and my employer's compliance department won't really answer questions about whether it's allowed to add extra repositories or install things not from the official Ubuntu repositories on company-owned hardware. (And they're always really threatening and assholeish about breaking the rules they won't elaborate on, so my best option is kindof just to interpret the rules as strictly as I can and follow that. Or else flout the rules and dare them to fire me. Heh...) Raising questions like that is always a whole thing.
    • "firefox" from the PPA repo and "firefox" from Snap have the same package name which makes things awkward dealing with Apt. (Unless you use "firefox-esr" from the PPA repo, which would otherwise be an acceptable workaround if that was the only issue.)

    So I just use Chrome on my work machine. I dislike Chrome more than Firefox for many reasons, but I at least mitigate some of the issues with Chrome by specifically not doing anything personal on my work machine. I don't really care if Chrome invades my employer's privacy. Especially when my employer doesn't give me a choice in browsers. If anything comes of it, it's their own damned fault.

    [–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago

    For the conflicting package names, there is at least the solution to pin the sources.list from the PPA with a higher priority than the official Ubuntu repository. This would work even package-wise.

    [–] lud@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago
    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

    This is coming from the same company that put Amazon ads on the dash