this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
310 points (93.3% liked)

Canada

7159 readers
132 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No, not in this case, they weren't taking away someone else's chance. But you didn't read the article. Her boyfriend was a match and wanted to donate part of his liver. Donar A wanted to give to recipient B, there was no recipient C losing out. It was a closed loop.

"No amount of determination from the (partner) could bend the decision,” said the physician. β€œThere was no process for a second review or appeal. Just a harsh finality ... goodbye."

She many have not even been the drunkard you all are assuming she was. If you go out once a month, and have 3 or 4 beers, you're not eligible for a liver transplant. That's ridiculous. You may not drink the other 30 days of the month, but that one Saturday ruined it for you; you die.

A life was forfeit, because some bean counters in white coats -probably not teetotalers themselves- deemed her not worthy. Even though it cost more to let her die,

Using the most recent data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information on hospital bed costs (2016), Huska’s time at the Oakville hospital likely cost over $450,000 - ($3,592 per day for ICU care) with an additional 61 days in a ward bed which likely cost about $1,200 a day

A liver transplant in Ontario is pegged at about $71,000 to $100,000 in Ontario based on data from 2019.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That is because her boyfriend could only give her a partial transplant (he cannot donate his whole liver) and the doctors did not think it would work as her liver was too far gone to recover with a partial transplant

The rest of your comment is so far from reality or logic, I'm not going to bother addressing it

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Cutting out someone's liver to transplant isn't easy nor risk free. You are risking death to have a low probability of saving someone. It doesn't matter if they are volunteers.

[–] KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca -5 points 1 month ago

Oh, way to move the goal posts!

Basically - fuck this person, right?

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Her partner is the one saying she had an alcohol substance use issue. It's not "assumed" she was a drunkard, he stated it. I agree she should have been given the liver- she quit alcohol, she had a donor. We shouldn't punish people with alcohol use issues by killing them.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The liver wasn't thrown away, it was given to someone else. The liver still saved a life, unfortunately it wasn't hers.

Unless you're talking about the boyfriend's liver, in which case the doctor determined her condition would not survive a partial transplant, and the attempt would just kill her sooner.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was talking about the general disturbing nature of determining organ transplants, yes I know re: the live donation from her bf

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So again: The liver wasn't thrown away, it was given to someone else. The liver still saved a life, unfortunately it wasn't hers.

Imagine being the person denied a liver because they gave it to someone with a chronic alcohol abuse problem to "give them another chance".