this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
307 points (86.5% liked)

United Kingdom

4108 readers
164 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's almost like people are looking for a reason to talk about how much they hate JKR, and in turn promote her.

The Streisand effect is in full display here.

Everytime people bring out the three minute hate drum, the righteous come around and sneer, so there is a echo chamber, but there's always somebody new, somebody who's never been introduced to the debate before, who now pays attention to this person... And they might end up agreeing with this person.

So giving all this attention to one person over and over again, is creating them more converts than it's costing them. It's just promoting the personality at this point. It'd be more effective to ignore them, and just promote your own viewpoint. There wouldn't be any controversy, there wouldn't be free media attention....

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/16/opinion/jk-rowling-transphobia.html

https://archive.ph/r7njg

Because she has asserted the right to spaces for biological women only, such as domestic abuse shelters and sex-segregated prisons. Because she has insisted that when it comes to determining a person’s legal gender status, self-declared gender identity is insufficient. Because she has expressed skepticism about phrases like “people who menstruate” in reference to biological women.

Her take isn't crazy - it's not supportive, but not phobic either, and she clearly enjoys the media attention and public debate. She thrives in it.. so she wins everytime people give her attention

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's almost like Rowling is always looking for a reason to talk about how much she hates trans people.

No matter where you stand on it you have to admit it's kind of sad with all her wealth and fame this is how she spends her energy

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we stop talking about her, she stops winning. Maybe she could spend her new found free time to actually write instead of being on social media.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ignoring bigots only encourages more bigotry. She needs to be called out on her bullshit each and every time. Whether or not it has any effect on her isn't the point - it shows others that such behavior is not acceptable.