this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
310 points (93.3% liked)

Canada

7224 readers
402 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe he should, but maybe he is thinking "Fuck them, we tried to participate in the system. We had a living donor to go. What? Oh you have a 'better' recipient? Well, guess who doesn't want to donate to a system that failed my loved one."

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The system didn't fail, it worked as intended. If but mid 30s you've destroyed your liver with your alcohol addiction, it's almost guaranteed you'll slide back.

Recipients can't drink ever, and have to take meds for life. She was not a good candidate for a transplant.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

I agree. I understand the rules and it makes sense to me. The people going through it don't care. The husband going through this loss doesn't care about other people needing his living donor liver, or there being better recipients. He would view it (I imagine) as "why should I donate when they didn't help my wife?"