this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
609 points (93.4% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
2917 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RandomGuy79@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Z is not savvy. They're basically boomers when it comes to tech. It always worked so it should work. None of our z staff can fix a printer and in fact none are allowed to

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Z is not savvy. They’re basically boomers when it comes to tech. It always worked so it should work. None of our z staff can fix a printer and in fact none are allowed to

they can be savvy, it just depends on how based and tech pilled they are. If they've only ever used a phone for example, they aren't. If they use linux as a daily driver, they definitely are.

Statistically, on average, gen z is less likely to be tech savvy though.

although in defense of gen z, fuck printers.

[–] cuuube@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

single worst human invention ngl

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

a stone tablet would be better tbh

probably. I think we should just be moving to engraved metal sheeting.

[–] RandomGuy79@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Not a very enlightened take. As @nednobbins@lemm.ee correctly put it, tech savviness is the property of an individual and not of a generation. There are non-savvy Zoomers, just as there are non-savvy people from your generation.

[–] Atrichum@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Of course, but the percentage of capable zoomers who are actually tech savvy is much smaller than millenials, for the reasons already stated.

Just the other day I witnessed a zoomer grad student who didn't know how to use a file explorer on his new windows laptop because he had grown up with an iPad and iPhone.

[–] toxic@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

People are saying it’s an individual issue but I will say that kids who grew up on iPads and iPhones definitely are less tech literate when it comes to using PCs. Utilizing file explorer or even a command line (gasp) is completely out of their comfort zone.

If something doesn’t work like it should, they generally call tech support to figure it out rather than Google and solve it themselves.

This is generally. I taught fifth grade math and science for five years and the lack of a true computer resource class has really hurt kids. I had to spend 4-5 weeks each year teaching 10-11 year olds how to use computers. What copy and paste is, how to sign on to programs, how to attach a document, how to navigate a web portal, how to type on a keyboard, how to navigate Google slides/powerpoint or Google docs/word, etc because before fifth grade they had iPads instead of Chromebooks. Out of the 40-50 students I’d have each year, maybe 2 would know how to do even three of these things.

Most didn’t even know how to sign on because they were able to use faceid or use a QR code to sign in before fifth grade.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

For Boomers, cars was the latest tech that everyone was fiddling with. This caused even the boomer that wasn't very interested , to know quite a lot. For later generations, car became more of a means of transportation, and the knowledge of cars was only for specialists. For gen X, computers were the high tech thing, everyone was fiddling with. Most gen x can setup a printer if they have to. For later generations, computers are just tools, and the knowledge is only for specialists.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Video games and getting them to run on computers taught me most of what I know about them via "fiddling," so this checks out for this Xer.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

installing minecraft mods are what got me to where I am today, I approach tech stuff with a "I'll learn how to do this" (fiddling) rather than a "oh i'll just call the PC guy" that my mom would do.

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

80s millennial here and same. Getting games to run was so much work back in the 90s that I learned about computers. I think I got my first IT job because I was able to install and setup Word.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As @nednobbins@lemm.ee correctly put it, tech savviness is the property of an individual and not of a generation. There are non-savvy Zoomers, just as there are non-savvy people from your generation.

You're making the argument that the exception proves the rule, which is a misleading way to think about it. Most people in this thread are generalising the generations because that is a more accurate way to think about common behaviours or abilities across a very large group of people.

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

The effect is mostly from the total number of computer users increasing.

That is, the total number of "tech-savvy" users keeps increasing (https://datausa.io/profile/cip/computer-science-110701) but the number of "non-tech-savvy" computer users has absolutely exploded (https://semiconalpha.substack.com/p/global-semiconductor-sales-increase) (that actually undercounts computers since every dollar in 2020 buys you much more computer power than a dollar in 1987)

You had to pass a nerd gauntlet just to get online in the 80's or 90's that meant that everyone you met online had also passed that gauntlet and was tech savvy. Even if you looked in the social usenet groups, a lot of non-technical users were just filtered out. So it looked like everyone was tech savvy but that's because we were sampling a tiny, tech-savvy portion of the population.

Now anyone can get online. The tech savvy gen-zers are still there but their hidden in a sea of non-technical users. If you go to places like Github or Hackernews (or even more specifically technical fora), you'll find plenty of enthusiastic young people poking at technology and trying to make it better. They no longer have to mess around with autoexec.bat and config.sys to get their mouse working but they can (and do) get a bunch of Jupyter notebooks and start playing around with Tensorflow.

A great modern example of this is 3-D printing. Modern 3-D printers suck. If you're a big company you can get super expensive 3-D printers that take up giant rooms and need a team of experts to run. If you're a home user you can get a cheap FDM printer but you best be prepared to tinker with it. The first thing most people do with their Ender is print mods for their Ender. Bambu Labs is a big improvement but they also attract a lot of users who at least could mod their printer https://forum.bambulab.com/c/bambu-lab-x1-series/user-mods/19

Some day we may have little boxes like in "Diamond Age". Kids in the future may not even know about crap like bed adhesion and stringing and they'll concentrate on whatever the new problems are revealed once the current ones are taken care of.