this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
142 points (88.6% liked)

World News

38831 readers
2565 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Along with the very real and violent war on the ground – there is also a fierce information war. Like Tuesday’s explosion at the Gaza hospital which Hamas says killed hundreds of people.

Israel says it was a misfired Islamic Jihad rocket, which they deny. Hamas says it was an Israeli airstrike, which they deny.

But tonight Forensic Architecture, Earshot and the Ramallah based NGO Al Haq have shared new information with Channel 4 News they say casts doubt on some aspects of Israel’s account."

The evidence is presented in the video

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Doppler analysis is a really good approach. Assuming there are no glaring errors in the analysis: Israel is lying, it absolutely did not come from where they claim. It came from.... the direction of Israel.

But perhaps physics is just antisemitic now who knows

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

As a Jew who passed physics, I can tell you that it is not antisemitic. Nor is it to say "fuck PeePee Netanyahu's campaign of destruction and misinformation." Saying all Israelis are bad isn't antisemitic, but it's not correct. Saying that you dislike Israel because it has too many Jews is both antisemitic and valid, oddly enough. Saying you hate all Jews is antisemitic.

Anyway, most of the people telling you that not supporting Israel is antisemitic are, in fact, actual antisemites. They're the same people who say that it's actually racist to call someone a racist.

[–] evader_fateful@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That comment really made me think, thank you! The only part where I’m still stuck is the sentence “…most of the people telling you that not supporting Israel is antisemetic are, in fact, antisemites.” I can understand why their statement is incorrect at face value. But I haven’t quite untangled why they would be antisemites for making that statement. Would you please clarify that part for me?

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The quite is about correlation, not causation.

Antisemitic people tend to think that Isreal and all Jewish people do everything in lockstep because their antisemitic views include the "Jews controlling the world" myth. To them Isreal = Jews and therefore criticizing Isreal is the same thing as criticizing all Jewish people amd they want to play 'gotcha' based on that.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I don't think the statement makes them anti-semitic, they just happen to be anti-semitic and use calling other people anti-semitic for anti-Israeli sentiments as a cover for their own racism.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There is a lot to unpack in your comment.

But good food for thought.

[–] deleted@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Now they have the right to defend themselves from physics.

[–] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Not disputing what you are saying but do you have a link to such an analysis?

[–] OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This story is about it, I haven't seen it myself! I would like to though, I did the same thing once in a radio astronomy context

[–] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Fair enough.

I'm pretty bemused at people taking the "independent" review of the missile strike by the Pentagon at face value.

I'm sorry, where are the weapons of mass destruction again?