this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
606 points (90.3% liked)

linuxmemes

21355 readers
2092 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] art@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I can make a file named COM1 on Linux. That's on the forbidden list for Windows.

    The forbidden list:

    • CON
    • PRN
    • AUX
    • CLOCK$
    • NUL
    • COM1
    • COM2
    • COM3
    • COM4
    • COM5
    • COM6
    • COM7
    • COM8
    • COM9
    • LPT1
    • LPT2
    • LPT3
    • LPT4
    • LPT5
    • LPT6
    • LPT7
    • LPT8
    • LPT9
    [–] lud@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    That's because Windows is generally very backwards compatible.

    [–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    So is Linux, but it puts stuff like that in /dev

    [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    The thing is, a lot of the legacy backwards compatible stuff that's in Linux is because a lot of things in Unix were actually pretty well thought out from the get go, unlike many of the ugly hacks that went into MSDOS and later Windows and overstayed their welcome.

    Things like: long case sensitive file names from the beginning instead of forced uppercase 8.3 , a hierarchical filesystem instead of drive letters, "everything is a file" concept, a notion of multiple users and permissions, pre-emptive multitasking, proper virtual memory management instead of a "640k is enough" + XMS + EMS, and so on.

    [–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    It still amazes me how well thought out unix was for the era when computing was in its infancy. But I guess that is what you get with computer science nerds from Universities and a budget for development based on making a product the goal, not quarterly profit the goal.

    [–] superkret@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

    It's what you get when you design an OS for a mainframe computer that is accessed by many users sharing its resources.
    DOS was designed for single-user PC's with very limited processing power, memory and storage, and no access to networked drives. Lots of its hacks and limitations saved a few hundred bytes of memory, which was crucial at the time.

    [–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

    I guess i was meaning compared to DOS but modern Windows, where stupid stuff is broken, and they care more about ads than creating a clean OS

    [–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    Unix was designed for mainframes, qdos/msdos was designed to be a cpm knockoff the local nerd could use to play commander keen and do his taxes. It's actually impressive how much modern/business functionality they were able to cram into that.

    [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 6 points 2 months ago

    Unix was designed for mainframes

    Unix was never for mainframes. It was for 16-bit minicomputers that sat below mainframes, but yes they were more advanced than the first personal computers.

    It’s actually impressive how much modern/business functionality they were able to cram into that.

    Absolutely, but you have to admit that it's a less solid foundation to build a modern operating system on.

    In the 80s, there were several Unices for PC too btw: AT&T, SCO, even Microsoft's own Xenix. Most of them were prohibitively expensive though.

    [–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    LPT1 LPT2 LPT3 LPT4 LPT5 LPT6 LPT7 LPT8 LPT9

    Why does Microsoft hate Life Pro Top listicles?

    [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 3 points 2 months ago

    You're probably joking, but in case you don't know: LPT stands for Line Printer Terminal, and LPT1, LPT2, LPT3... referred to parallel ports which were typically (though not exclusively) used to connect a printer.

    [–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

    oh no, but com5 is one of my favorite words! literally unusable.