this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
561 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59641 readers
2694 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Social media platforms like Twitter and Reddit are increasingly infested with bots and fake accounts, leading to significant manipulation of public discourse. These bots don't just annoy users—they skew visibility through vote manipulation. Fake accounts and automated scripts systematically downvote posts opposing certain viewpoints, distorting the content that surfaces and amplifying specific agendas.

Before coming to Lemmy, I was systematically downvoted by bots on Reddit for completely normal comments that were relatively neutral and not controversial​ at all. Seemed to be no pattern in it... One time I commented that my favorite game was WoW, down voted -15 for no apparent reason.

For example, a bot on Twitter using an API call to GPT-4o ran out of funding and started posting their prompts and system information publicly.

https://www.dailydot.com/debug/chatgpt-bot-x-russian-campaign-meme/

Example shown here

Bots like these are probably in the tens or hundreds of thousands. They did a huge ban wave of bots on Reddit, and some major top level subreddits were quiet for days because of it. Unbelievable...

How do we even fix this issue or prevent it from affecting Lemmy??

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] asap@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

How much resources are we talking about here? If it's 3% of your CPU usage for 2 seconds, you're really going to have an issue with that?

Whatever solution should be negligible for you, but costly for a botfarm.

Here's a live example, not exactly onerous: https://demo.mcaptcha.org/widget/?sitekey=pHy0AktWyOKuxZDzFfoaewncWecCHo23

(Obviously in Lemmy's case you wouldn't have the additional unecessary checkbox)

[–] higgsboson@dubvee.org 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That's not what I consider negligible on my phone, which is already resource constrained. Yes, I have a problem with an app that intentionally wastes my valuable resources. I wouldn't care so much from my desktop, but I mostly just use a desktop client to do things I can't easily do on my mobile clients.

No big deal. It's not as if my participation is especially valuable. I would just participate less.

edit: my objection is obviously more in principal than it is practical, but it would hardly be the first time I walked away from software (or a network) on philosophical grounds.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

If we can't find a more practical solution, then is it really a "waste" of resources? Right now we're paying with much more expensive time and attention.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

that was pretty fast. i think if I was a bot sending prompts to an AI to generate posts, i probably wouldn't care about this amount of computation at all

[–] asap@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Must be strange to live in a world where you can't imagine that software could have configurable parameters, such that you could find something that's fine for a person posting individual comments and painful for a bot farm.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

15 seconds to generate a post from the prompt with ai, and 1/15 seconds for the hashcash challenge is supposed to inconvenience the bot wizards?

[–] asap@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If they're running their own LLM hardware, and their Lemmy spam posts are generating enough revenue to cover that, then I take it back, because that is impressive.

I guess we're fucked.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

It’s not always about profit, it’s also about controlling the narrative. The more expensive that is, the less the narrative can be controlled by money.