this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
142 points (94.9% liked)

Explain Like I'm Five

14306 readers
272 users here now

Simplifying Complexity, One Answer at a Time!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't see how it's a benefit to capitalism or companies or, well, anyone, really, to allow people to make thousands of trades a day for minute profits on each.

My gut feeling is that the stock market would not suffer, and less resources would be wasted, if trades and updates to stock prices were limited to, say, one batch per hour.

There are probably reasons the system is the way it is though.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] manucode@infosec.pub 22 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Maybe we could charge a minor fee per transaction, too small to matter for most stock traders. High frequency traders though would have to pay quite a lot simply by making lots of transactions.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

They pondered some ridiculously low fee, like 0.0000002% (no kidding) and it was too much here in the EU.

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 2 points 2 months ago

The investment bank already does that and calls it commission. It's basically how the Wolf of Wall Street's main character got started: commission on penny stocks.