this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
198 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
2807 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
198
Fugees rapper says lawyer's use of AI helped tank his case, pushes for new trial (www.aol.com)
submitted 1 year ago by Salamendacious@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A multimillion-dollar conspiracy trial that stretched across the worlds of politics and entertainment is now touching on the tech world with arguments that a defense attorney for a Fugees rapper bungled closing arguments by using an artificial intelligence program.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's what the appeals process is for.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't know about this particular lawyer, but I have heard that some lawyers will try novel court strategies, knowing that it's a win-win situation. If the strategy works, then their clients benefit, and if the strategy doesn't work, their clients get an appeal for having ineffective counsel where they normally wouldn't have an appeal.

[–] Neato@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If a client gets an appeal for ineffective counsel how is that counsel not brought up before the bar for review? That seems like a death knell for a lawyer.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

People don't generally get sanctioned for making honest mistakes. I didn't say that a lawyer would tank the case on purpose, just that they'd try a new strategy. If no lawyers were allowed to try new strategies without facing penalties, that also seems like a bad system.

[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Not sure if there is a procedure for when a lawyer is practicing, I have never heard of a bar referral after a ruling on a motion for ineffective assistance in NY, but I have heard of retiring attorneys landing on the grenade so to speak and writing affidavits claiming that anything they may have touched in the slightest was somehow deficient, spoiled or tainted by their involvement if it can get a shot at more billable work/appeal.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I had never heard that. Is there a name for that? Or do you have a place I can read more about it?