Games

16800 readers

775 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

176

'This game is going to easily—and I mean easily—take over': Major streamers, early fans, and esports players share their Deadlock hype after Valve opens the floodgates (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 2 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

123 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Iapar@feddit.org 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So it is not about the personality of the streamer but the games they play?

[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

It's both for me. Example: I like Grubby and his WC3 content, never watched him playing Dota as it doesn't pique my interest. I don't watch ToD's WC3 streams because I cannot stand his personality.

But neither is there an obligation for anyone to provide the content I enjoy nor am I obligated to watch content of anyone that I don't enjoy.

[–] jay@mbin.zerojay.com -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Depends on the streamer, I guess. Personality probably matters more to those that are variety streamers - people that play many different games at any given point with a large general audience and probably less important for those that specialize in a specific game that has a built-in community of people interested in that game.

[–] abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

One of the finer points of something new is getting in at the right time. I have to imagine if you're a streamer and you force yourself to stay on your old game "for the fans," you could miss out on the shiny new thing that people care about. This could literally cost them money that they need for rent. I am confident that many streamers are not highly paid and depend on this income.

Don't forget, fans are fickle, corporations are fickle, everyone is fickle. I don't think any employee of a company should be loyal to that company if it is to their own detriment as that company will let their employees go if it needs to (better companies try harder, worse companies make worse decisions).

I don't see why a streamer should treat their career differently. Do what you think is best for you. Streamers don't owe me, the fan, and it doesn't do me any good for them to force themselves to play a game they're less interested in just to appease me.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 5 points 2 months ago

Yeah, being a variety streamer is among the toughest you can be, and I've heard more than one streamer off-the-record complain about being "stuck in their rut" as their fan base is largely tied to a game they're no longer passionate about.

With all the hype surrounding a Valve game, I'm not at all surprised at people jumping at the chance.