this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
374 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59597 readers
3752 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
374
Why do all these companies developing privatised software use the word "Open"? Real question. (lemmy.cat)
submitted 1 year ago by retiolus@lemmy.cat to c/technology@lemmy.world
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
  • OpenAI
  • OpenText
  • OpenVMS
  • OpenServer
  • OpenEdge
  • OpenDrive
  • etc.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] jack@monero.town 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Who argues about copyleft and libre? The FSF and Stallman are clear about libre meaning the same as free.

MIT is just as free/libre as GPL, but copyleft is the logical choice when you value user freedom.

[โ€“] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I mean I have seen many comments over the years in favour of MIT over GPL because 'it gives more freedom' without the restrictions imposed by GPL's copyleft. This is just anecdotal so maybe not many have that view.