this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
1952 points (98.5% liked)

memes

17022 readers
3738 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As someone who did a trial Disney plus 4 years ago, is that TOS still valid if they came and murdered me in their restaurant?

I'm legit asking.

[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean you didn't fully read the TOS?

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I just copy and paste their TOS and ask ChatGPT and according to it, even if I'm no longer a subscriber, they can still enforce arbitration.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The mouse can now can legally assassinate you in your sleep.

If you're asking whether the binding arbitration clause would apply to the murder case, then no. Homicide falls under criminal law, where the state is the plaintiff. The state didn't enter an agreement under the TOS. I suppose Disney could try to argue it applies if your legal estate filed a civil suit; in the real case it argued that the arbitration clause applied because the husband (who'd agreed to it) filed a civil suit as the plaintiff.

Instead, Disney would get away with it the old-fashioned way: because it's a rich corporation.

[–] Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's exactly what happened here. So the result of this suit will be your answer

[–] Kimjongtooill@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Disney backpeddeled on that argument because of the PR nightmare. But the damage is done