this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
296 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

1421 readers
833 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

CEO Carl Pei says remote work “is not compatible” with the company.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How to do lay off people without having to fork out severance pay.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I've seen that theory a lot, but I just don't think it's actually all that common. Layoffs are layoffs, but the common thing about layoffs is they are usually calculated to cut the worst performing employees and go up from there.

A forced RTO policy is going to be unpredictable in who stays and who goes

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Even worse, mandatory RTO selects for employees who have no choice but to stay. The talent will bail out.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

also it guarantees that everyone starts using working hours to apply for jobs instead of doing their work.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago

The thing is, these decisions are made at a level that doesn't much care for the distinction. Mid-level managers know who the good workers are, and in regular layoffs they'd be making decisions about who to lay off. But even before that happens, top-level executives have decided how many to lay off, and it's not much of a concern to them who specifically goes.

Same with RTO constructive layoffs. They estimate a certain percentage will quit, reducing their cost base. There's not much more thought than that.