this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
728 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
2943 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mazda is angry a customer used an API in a manner they couldn't control. You can read the DMCA takedown notice here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 113 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I didn’t really get it until I read the article (shut up 😃), but it seems pretty clear that Mazda’s primary concern here appears to be access to this API through Home Assistant cutting off future (maybe current) owners’ requirement to subscribe to their app for features.

[–] rem26_art@kbin.social 90 points 1 year ago (2 children)

man, remember when you could buy a car and it wasnt connected to the internet?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Remember when you could buy a car and it was yours?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

John Deere doesn't

[–] nephs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remember when you could download a car?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Pepperidge Farm remembers.

[–] OrderedChaos@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Pepperidge farms remembers.

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 47 points 1 year ago

What a load of horse shit.

Just like with hue, and Chromecast, and Android TV, and a million other smart devices, it's perfectly lawful (and IMHO necessary) for individuals to launch their own integrations with their the products they own. People don't need their bullshit "service", and by buying the vehicle they have a legally protected right to alter it and it's software for their own use.

That they bullied this guy into taking down the repo despite what the law protects him to do is disgusting, if not also predictable.

I hope someone with the time and resources goes to the matt with one of these shit companies and make them own up to their exploitative practices.

I for one will be altering my Mazda how I want and sharing my alterations to get around their shit subscription model with everyone I can.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

God forbid. Wouldn't want users to find any of this useful in novel ways. Because that never makes a product popular or anything. And Mazda might lose hundreds of dollars or something. Gasp.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pretty soon we'll have to subscribe to our car's trunk.

[–] synestine@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

BMW on the line for you, sir.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

How far can americans go in their struggle against small mailboxes? I mean, what other solution is there, with their huge, largely-empty front lawns, than to use a car to accept the packages?