this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
288 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

59555 readers
3396 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 90 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

And violating [an app's] terms of service puts you in jeopardy under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986, which is the law that Ronald Reagan signed in a panic after watching Wargames (seriously!).

I watched it two days ago, that's tragicomic.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I know, right? Like how the hell do you get worried from such a silly movie.. Unless he knew the us military defense systems were in fact that weak, against people and their telephones.

Nah, Reagan was just a wuss.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 27 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Of all the things that happen in the movie, the thought that someone will have hooked a top-secret defense computer up to a modem is the one that is the absolute most believable.

Like, it's entirely going to have happened at some point.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I kind of expect it to be required, SCADA has had plenty of ancestry. But you'd expect the NSA to have been consulted on how to prevent interaction with the general public..

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

for several years in the early 00's, the process for getting security clearance involved no background check, just knowing who to ask. they literally rubber stamped it.

getting a fed job or something still did, but just security clearance, on its own, for anyone? just ask. not even nicely.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I did a security clearance interview for someone a while ago, and the agent they sent was very polite and the whole conversation ended up being about if my friend pirated media.

I was very confused and had no idea what his media acquisition methods were, and no idea why that was literally the only thing I was asked during the interview.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

it WAS dealt with pretty quick, but yeah I bet it's still pretty absurd, even if they at least ask... some questions?

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I love Star Wars EU mostly for correctly showing how societies work in such regards.

When something happens there (unconnected to ancient magic), it usually involves a few pretty mundane snafus, and even if descriptions used make tech people and engineers cringe, the general situation just makes sense.

TCW and Disney era, on the other hand - ugh.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

also, just imagine the threat was that defense systems could be invaded by your average citizen.

Let's put resources to making them secure then, right? Nah, let's just make it illegal to guess passwords. That will surely prevent bad things from happening.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

basic state logic.

they're incapable of sucking less. their whole episteme is about centralizing, about reducing thought the farther it gets from the central authority (whether that's one guy, a class, or a building like the pentagon), but you CAN increase violence, threaten, flatten, disable, basically wherever.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That's how I feel about it as well. Better to upgrade the safe than to add warning posters.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The nuclear codes for decades was 00000000. That's all you needed to launch nukes.

Our cyber security was atrocious

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

At least now it's 00000000!123

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Maybe it's my ADHD, but I actually feel much better (very light and easy) reading such things. Nukes with zero launch codes, laws being made after watching movies for teens, Soviet caliber differences intended to make Soviet ammunition just a bit too large to be usable by the potential enemy, BTR-1 being basically a transport so that infantry wouldn't die while traversing nuked land, thus with no real protection against anything, and so on.

I mean, nuking another country by mistake is better than not nuking it when necessarily, or so someone judged. But some other people wanted some protection against fools, so theoretically they had that.