this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58713 readers
4033 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dhhyfddehhfyy4673@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Daily reminder that IP law is fucking stupid.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

And always about protecting the hegemony of the rich and powerful.

It's never about the struggling artist/inventor just wanting to be paid for their work as the lobbyists and the politicians they own pretend every time they want to fuck over regular people some more.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The rich didn't come up with the IP. It was the employees who did. They also want to get paid. Imagine someone stealing your ideas and then you losing your job over it.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

B/S. The article states that this company bought the IP from Makerbot in 2013 so nobody working there was responsible for creating these patents. This is like when people claim that piracy hurts the people working on the set of a movie. It actually doesn't because those people were already paid their wages while the billion dollar corporations are the ones who own the rights and profit off of sales with none of that going to the workers outside of their normal wage.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If there is no incentive to make profits on IP, nobody will hire people to develop the IP. Congrats, you made the rich lose their profits but you also made everyone lose their jobs.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes because nobody had jobs before IP law and nothing was invented.

[–] doodledup@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

IP law was invented when it became necessary to protect it. We no longer live in a cave but in a globalized and industrialized world economy.

Most value nowadays is IP. Producing goods is easy, everyone can do that now. Manufacturing is easy. Logistics is easy. Inventing stuff is NOT easy anymore in a digitalized world! So in order to encourage innovation, we need to have incentives that protects your innovation and pays your bills. And since most innovation is IP, we need IP protection. Simple logic. The alternative would be total economical collapse.

Your idealistic world view simply doesn't work in this day and age.