Technology

59578 readers

3381 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

705

Proton is transitioning towards a non-profit structure | Proton (proton.me)

submitted 3 months ago by just_another_person@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

182 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Bitwarden client has all the data cached, so the server can be down and you still get access to the passwords (same for internet connection).

[–] Arn_Thor@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for the reply! That makes sense. I’m still weary of the client somehow losing the cache while the server is down (two holes in the Swiss cheese lining up) but that is overly paranoid I know that

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You should definitely be! I take backups every 6h for my self hosted vaultwarden (easier to manage and to backup, but not official, YMMV). You can also restore each backup automatically and have a "second service" you can run elsewhere (a standby basically), which will also ensure the backup works fine.

I have been running bit/vaultwarden now for I think 6 years, for my whole family and I have never needed to do anything, despite having had a few hiccups with the server.

Don't take my word for it, but the clients (browser plugin, desktop app, mobile app) are designed to keep data locally I think. So the term cache might be misleading here because it suggests some temporary storage used just to save web requests, with a relatively quick expiration. In this case I think the plugin etc. can work potentially indefinitely without server - something to double-check, but I believe it's the design.

[–] Arn_Thor@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

Yes, I figured the word “cache” was used loosely in this case. But you know, the server is down and/or irrecoverable for a while, and then one’s phone gets swiped. Not inconceivable. So I think I’ll follow some of the advice here about a backup service or password stash