this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
73 points (74.8% liked)

politics

19047 readers
4281 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

You're actually saying with a straight face that this was worse than the debate in 2020 where trump interrupted every single sentence? That's fucking rich to me. That was some of the most embarrassing public moments America has endured.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Biden at least got some good "C'mon, man."s out of the chaotic format.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I guess. Just sucks that Trump being an awful person doesn't work against him but the old guy getting tongue tied does.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yes. It was worse.

And yes, that was also the things you said it was.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The previous debate was far, far worse. But don't let that get in the way of your exaggerations

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why is it exaggerating to have a different opinion...?

That's dismissive and rude.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I think a lot of people watched the debate (or didn't) and are flipping out about it. I watched the whole thing, it was cringy and sad. But it didn't really change anything unless the people in power provide another democratic candidate. If we talk ad nauseum about how bad it was for Biden, all that does is discourage voters into staying at home.

I despise the idea that the louder more confident liar is seen as "better" somehow. But even Democrats are running with that idea right now. Biden getting overwhelmed a few times doesn't invalidate his presidency past or future

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That was actually a valid debate strategy for his toxic base. Losing your train of thought and failing to land points on your opponent is not.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 3 points 3 months ago

That's the thing: Trump is playing to his base, whenever he is rude. It is unfair that liberals demand more from their candidates than conservatives but that is the way that it is. Knowing this, someone could aim to win, or else they could... not, I guess.