this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
705 points (91.4% liked)

memes

9948 readers
3095 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gakomi@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Just change the extension to PNG

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Do people really think this changes the file type?

[–] Gakomi@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No I don't think it does but it works. Specifically I download webp pictures on pc and when I try to send them on WhatsApp it does not recognise them so I change the extension to JPG or PNG and it works it sends them and they can be viewed.

[–] tweeks@feddit.nl 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Sounds like the file type verification on WhatsApp is not on mime-type but only on extension. Some receivers might have trouble opening these though.

[–] Gakomi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Well so far I did not encounter any issues so as long as it works I'll still do it like this

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

They might use standard imagemagick or such on the backend meaning they can ingest pretty much any image format ever invented, and have a limited set of extensions allowed on the frontend side so people don't upload .txts.

[–] FuzzChef@feddit.de 1 points 3 months ago

In my experience, WhatsApp does not send an image unchanged. So it doesn't matter if the recipient can handle it, as long as WhatsApp's conversion can

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)