UK Politics

3092 readers

117 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

Shipley Conservative Sir Philip Davies 'bet £8,000 he would lose his seat' (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 4 months ago by GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] woop_woop@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sweet summer child..

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The idea that anyone would put in all the work to get selected as a candidate, then decide it was a smart move to place a bet against themselves and throw the election to make a quick buck is ridiculous. There's no way you could make enough money from the bet to make it worthwhile.

[–] woop_woop@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

There's actually a term for it

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dummy_candidate

Or this - see the UK section

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_candidate

"All the work to be a candidate"...

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It requires huge amounts of work to be a candidate. I know people who've run for parliament. One of them had previously run as a total no-hoper on multiple occasions, in order to prove he knew how to campaign well enough to get selected for a seat where he had a chance. He was so burned out by the selection process that having won the selection, he actually turned down the nomination, then quit politics altogether. The idea that he'd have deliberatey thrown any of those elections is ridiculous.

[–] woop_woop@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So we're just ignoring this part then?

In Britain, being nominated as a local election candidate simply involves signing some forms, with no deposit required. A paper candidate will often do no campaigning at all and so be able to submit a zero return of election expenses, simplifying the paperwork for the election agent. Paper candidates are commonly fielded in different locations by all the major parties in both local and national elections.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In Britain, being nominated as a local election candidate simply involves signing some forms

They're not local election candidates.

[–] polonius-rex@kbin.run 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This isn't some no-name who's scraped their way in after years of effort; he's been the candidate since 2005.

Placing a bet against himself is absolutely the kind of thing that could jeopardize both his candidacy going forward, and his election chances. So "he wouldn't do all that just to throw it away" is nonsense.

The man has literally given himself financial incentive not to win and you don't see how that kind of conflict of interests is an issue? Are you real?

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Even if his only incentives were financial, he will make more money by winning than by losing, because an MP's salary and expenses are pretty good. So, even taking into account the innumeracy of your average MP, he does not have a financial incentive to lose.

[–] polonius-rex@kbin.run 1 points 4 months ago

he will make more money by winning than by losing

assuming he wins, which isn't a guarantee for any tory at this point

"he's hedged his bets" isn't the justification you think it is